priors.science/reviews/magnesium

Magnesium

The current evidence on 6 claims, ordered from most established to most contested. Each score is the panel’s evidence certainty: how firmly the literature supports the claim as stated.

8claims tracked
6assessed
80primary papers reviewed
4 Oct 2026latest evidence review
0 Established · 0 Likely · 5 Uncertain · 1 Doubtful  |  four-reviewer panel · PICO Framework
ClaimStandingEvidence certaintyCorpus
Magnesium lowers blood pressureCardiovascularLong-standingUncertain66%18
Magnesium and bone densityMusculoskeletalUncertain62%12
Magnesium for migraineNeurologicalUncertain60%12
Magnesium for sleepNeurologicalEarly evidenceUncertain60%13
Magnesium improves glycaemic controlMetabolicUncertain57%14
Magnesium for leg crampsMusculoskeletalDoubtful30%13
Track Magnesium.
These claims are re-checked against new research as it is published. Track this topic for the full review, including each claim’s challenge and the papers behind it.
Track this topic →
Standing: what the evidence certainty means
Established≥ 85%Strong, consistent evidence. Unlikely to change.
Likely70–84%Well supported, with some gaps or indirect evidence.
Uncertain50–69%Mixed or limited evidence. Genuinely open.
Doubtful30–49%Little support; the weight of evidence leans against it.
Refuted< 30%The evidence contradicts it. Confidently false as stated.
A standing changes only when the score moves past a boundary by more than 4 points, the re-scoring noise floor; a score within 4 points of a boundary keeps its previous standing.
Where the evidence sits in time
Early evidenceMost of this evidence is from the last two years.
Long-standingMost of this evidence is older than the rest of this field.